|
Select
any paper listed below and receive it TODAY
for only $
/page +FREE bibliography!!!
|
Papers On More Philosophers & Philosophies
Page 66 of 204
|
|
Discussions of the Cosmological, Ontological and Teleological Arguments and Criticisms on the Existence of God by Descartes, Kant and Hume
[ send me this paper ]
This is a 9 page paper discussing the cosmological, ontological and teleological arguments and criticisms in regards to the existence of God by Descartes, Kant and Hume. Rene Descartes, Immanuel Kant and David Hume among many others have arguments in regards to the existence of God. Descartes offered cosmological and ontological arguments for the existence of God. Descartes’ cosmological argument is causal in its format as it is based on the premise that the idea of infinite perfection could only originate from the real existence of an infinite being. From an ontological perspective, Descartes offers a more simple presupposition in that whatever he clearly can perceive is true and if he can perceive the idea of God, then God exists. Kant argues primarily against the use of presuppositions in Descartes arguments as he notes that “existence is not a property or predicate” but merely a “positing of a thing”. Hume, on the other hand criticizes the arguments on the basis that “matter of fact” can only be based on experience. In addition, “whatever we conceive as existent, we can also conceive as non-existent”. Hume also argues against the analogies used in the teleological arguments for the existence of God because they too can never settle a factual question and to assume that one can know a cause of an action without experiencing it is a faulty and misleading assumption as events or actions can be caused by multiple purposes and no one cause can be assumed.
Bibliography lists 7 sources.
Filename: TJcosmo1.rtf
Dismantling Truth
[ send me this paper ]
A 6 page paper which discusses the subject of solidarity versus
objectivity as is presented in the article “Dismantling Truth : Solidarity versus
Objectivity,” by Richard Rorty. In this paper we address the illustrations provided by
Rorty as he demonstrates, and attempts to explain, how truth should have its own
language that could prove flexible and inclusive in relationship to the gap that exists
between the sciences and the humanities. In addressing this concern of Rorty’s we look at
some of the issues he has brought up and compare them with realities that help to define
his ideas. No additional sources cited.
Filename: RArorty.wps
Disney’s “Cinderella”: Art or Industrialized Culture
[ send me this paper ]
A 6 page paper which
examines various theories and then applies them to Disney’s “Cinderella.” The paper
examines if the cartoon film is art or a reflection of industrialized culture, or both.
Bibliography lists 2 sources.
Filename: RAsnow.rtf
Distributive Justice, Utilitarianism, and John Rawls
[ send me this paper ]
This 5
page report discusses the work of American philosopher and
political scientist John Rawls and his 1971 book, A Theory of
Justice. In it, Rawls presents an alternative to the fundamental
principle of political utilitarianism and keeps his thinking
throughout the book within the parameters of the social contract
beliefs and attitudes of John Locke, Jean Jacques Rousseau, and
Immanuel Kant and then bases his own “system” on two fundamental
propositions. Bibliography lists 4 sources.
Filename: BWjrawls.wps
Divine Command v. Ethical Egoism
[ send me this paper ]
A 3 page essay that compares and contrasts the ethical system of divine command and ethical egoist. The writer argues that both concepts are seriously flawed. Bibliography lists 3 sources.
Filename: khdivee.rtf
Divisibility
[ send me this paper ]
This 5 page paper looks at the divisibility thesis and presents views by Locke and Hobbes in its regard. Other philosophers are mentioned in a discussion that embraces both science and political philosophy. Bibliography lists 4 sources.
Filename: SA046div.wps
Do Natural Rights Exist?
[ send me this paper ]
This paper examines the idea of natural rights and argues that the do exist and can be traced from the ideas of John Locke through to today’s society, manifesting in tools such as the International Bill of Rights, the European Convention on Human Rights and in the UK the Human Rights Act. The bibliography cite 4 sources.
Filename: TEnatrig
Do We Feed the Poor?
[ send me this paper ]
A 5 page paper discussing whether the rich countries of the world have a moral obligation to feed the poor ones. 'Give a man a fish, feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish, feed him for a lifetime' applies, but there seem to be few who believe it. The views of Peter Singer and Garrett Hardin are compared in this paper, but both views are only in absolute terms. Neither author appears to be willing to consider alternatives that are any more cooperative than the passage of sentence in the Roman Coliseum. For them, it is either thumbs up or thumbs down on the hungry of the world, while actual solution is much more likely through the extended hand that also can grasp a shovel. Bibliography lists 2 sources.
Filename: Poorfood.wps
Didn't find what you're
looking for yet? Try a keyword search above or
have a NEW research paper customized
on any topic you like!!!
-or-
SELECT ONE OF THE TERM PAPER
ASSISTANCE OPTIONS BELOW:
Samples
| Testimonials
| Best
Term Paper Help Links
MORE TERM PAPER HELP
SITES:
Shakespeare
- The Best Papers
| Best
Term
Paper Tutors
| Best
Paper
Hunting
|
Best
Papers
24 7
|
| More
Papers
|
No Cheaters Papers
|
Buy Papers
|
Term
Paper HQ
|
Term Papers - Help NOW!
|
Term
Paper Geeks
| Thesis
Statements
|
Paper Writers
|
Papers 1-2-3
|
Online-Papers
|
Paper Download
|
Pick-a-Paper
|
Web-Based-Papers
|
Writing Papers
|
Sharing Papers
|
Easy Papers
| Best
Term Paper Advice
|
Choose a Paper
|
Best Advanced Papers
|
Ace Papers
|
Plato Papers
|
Aristotle Papers
|
Philosophy Papers
|
Criminal Justice Papers
|
Best Political
Science Papers
| Ecology
Papers |
Best History Papers
| Best Health Papers
|