 |
 |
Historical
Background in Behn’s "Oroonoko"
by K. Bernardo,
for The Paper Store, Inc.
The intention
of Restoration author Aphra Behn, in composing her novella Oroonoko,
was not to write either historical or political fiction. She conceived
her story as an adventure with a romantic slant, and unlike Thomas
Southerne, who later rewrote Behn’s story with a white heroine, Behn
had no problem handling a black love story. She spent part of her
girlhood in Surinam, and consequently is so completely at home with
her black characters that she develops their story as a
straightforward romance whose protagonists could be blue, black, or
green. Admittedly, some of the situations in which the lovers find
themselves could only happen in the West Indies during the seventeenth
century; but this does not affect the power of Oroonoko’s love for
the beautiful Imoinda, and her love for him.
That being
said, this may help to defray some of the critical insistence that Oroonoko
ought to be read as either an anthropology text or a slave narrative.
An anthropology text it clearly is not; it is utterly enjoyable
popular fiction, and if Behn sets her story against a cultural
background she knows well, it is for the purpose of advancing her
plot, not as a means to impart everything we might ever want to know
about the lifestyles of black people in the West Indies during the
seventeenth century.
Nor is Oroonoko
a slave narrative. For one thing, even though slavery does prominently
figure in the plot, Oroonoko cannot be a slave narrative
because it doesn’t follow the basic rules of the genre. Technically,
a slave narrative ought to be written or dictated by a slave. But at
the very least, it needs to follow the tragic and poignant story of an
honest, sincere, hard-working, faithful, submissive, and absolutely
exemplary individual who is cruelly enslaved by people of a much baser
moral character than his. (This would allow us to include such
white-written works as Uncle Tom’s Cabin in the overall slave
narrative genre, since their intent is the same; to prove that the
slave in no way deserves his plight, and is in fact no different from
the upstanding white people reading his story.)
|
 |
 |